Gaslighting Logic

Gaslighting Logic: the distorted and flawed reasoning ability of a gaslighting victim. A sustained campaign of inculcated false narratives results in the scrambling of the gaslit prey’s thoughts, emotions, and intellectual capacities to the point of becoming impaired. This results in brainwashing out the victim’s logical thoughts and reasoning skills, replacing them with the carefully and systematically engineered false versions. Gaslighting logic renders the victim unable to recall their former critically thinking self, believing subconsciously the instilled principles, reasoning, and rational thinking are their own. This implanted system of reasoning is resistant to another person’s attempts to break it down or dispute it. The following represents the semi-linear nature of gaslighting logic:

Available Now! The Human Magnet Syndrome: The Codependent Narcissist Trap click here to buy your copy today!

If he says something is true, then it must be. He would never lie to me.
If he says something is true, then it must be. He would never lie to me.

My beloved is right; I am so lucky to have him, as no one else could deal with my craziness.
My beloved is right; I am so lucky to have him, as no one else could deal with my craziness.

Gaslighting Logic: the distorted and flawed reasoning ability of a gaslighting victim. A sustained campaign of implanted false or doctored narratives results in the scrambling of the gaslit prey’s thoughts, emotions, and intellectual capacities to the point of becoming impaired.
Gaslighting Logic: the distorted and flawed reasoning ability of a gaslighting victim. A sustained campaign of implanted false or doctored narratives results in the scrambling of the gaslit prey’s thoughts, emotions, and intellectual capacities to the point of becoming impaired.

Circular Gaslighting: when the gaslighter uses the implanted problem, as justification for the pain and suffering reported by their entrapped victim.
Circular Gaslighting: when the gaslighter uses the implanted problem, as justification for the pain and suffering reported by their entrapped victim.

He promises to never leave me, despite my debilitating psychological problems.
He promises to never leave me, despite my debilitating psychological problems.

With his encouragement and promise of financial support, I quit my job.
With his encouragement and promise of financial support, I quit my job.

I stopped seeing the counselor because I heard him complaining about our bills.
I stopped seeing the counselor because I heard him complaining about our bills.

My beloved wouldn’t hurt me because he always shows me how much I matter to him.
My beloved wouldn’t hurt me because he always shows me how much I matter to him.

He tells me he unconditionally loves me despite my bad and sometimes annoying habits.
He tells me he unconditionally loves me despite my bad and sometimes annoying habits.

The doctor agreed with my husband about my need to be more trusting of him.
The doctor agreed with my husband about my need to be more trusting of him.

After I confronted him about my suspicions of his infidelity, he took me to the emergency room to get help for my out-of-control paranoia.
After I confronted him about my suspicions of his infidelity, he took me to the emergency room to get help for my out-of-control paranoia.

Although he reminds me I am getting worse, he is also my cheerleader for not losing hope.
Although he reminds me I am getting worse, he is also my cheerleader for not losing hope.